Is your 92% health score telling the whole story?

Move the sliders and see how weighted average, RMS, geometric mean, and a penalty model react.

Component inputs

Set each dimension from 0 to 100 and watch how the aggregate scores respond.

🚦 Guardrails
  • Zero rule: if any component is 0, cap at 40.
  • Floor rule: if any component is below 40, cap at 65.
  • For this demo, caps apply only to Weighted Avg and RMS.
Score divergence
Notice how Weighted Avg can stay high while one component is much lower.
Quick analysis
Click "Generate summary" for a short, rule-based explanation.
Method breakdown
Which should you trust?

In most engineering and operations contexts, keep the weighted average for quick reporting and use the penalty or geometric view when you are making real risk calls. The question is not just "What is the score?", but "Is any critical dimension allowed to quietly fail while this slide still says we are healthy?"